Monday, September 11, 2023

Do you any difference between Aristotle's definition of Tragedy and Dryden's definition of Play?

This Blog is written as a part of thinking activity.

Assigned by Dilip Bard sir.

Q -2.(A) Difference between Aristotle's                      definition of Tragedy and                                  Dryden's definition of Play:- 

 •Introduction:

In the realm of dramatic literature, Aristotle and John Dryden stand as towering figures, each contributing unique definitions and philosophies regarding theatrical works. Aristotle's concept of tragedy and Dryden's vision of plays offer distinct perspectives on what constitutes a compelling dramatic experience. This blog post will delve into the differences between Aristotle's definition of tragedy and Dryden's definition of a play.

•Aristotle's Definition of Tragedy:






Aristotle, the ancient Greek philosopher, laid the foundation for understanding tragedy in his seminal work, "Poetics." According to Aristotle, tragedy serves a specific purpose: the catharsis of emotions, particularly pity and fear, in the audience. The key elements of Aristotle's definition are as follows:

1.Tragic Hero: Central to Aristotle's definition is the tragic hero, a character of noble stature who possesses admirable qualities and a tragic flaw, or "hamartia." It is this flaw that leads to their ultimate downfall.

2.Reversal of Fortune: Aristotle emphasizes the concept of "peripeteia," or the reversal of fortune, experienced by the tragic hero. This reversal is usually a result of their hamartia and serves to intensify the dramatic tension.

3.Catharsis: Aristotle's ultimate goal for tragedy is to evoke emotions of pity and fear in the audience, which are then purged or cleansed through catharsis. In essence, the audience's emotional involvement leads to a sense of emotional release and renewal.

•Dryden's Definition of Play:

John Dryden, a prominent English poet and playwright of the 17th century, shared his thoughts on drama in his essay "Essay of Drumstick Poesie." Dryden's definition of a play differs significantly from Aristotle's, reflecting the neoclassical ideals of his era. Key aspects of Dryden's definition include:

1.Unity of Time, Place, and Action: Dryden emphasized the importance of adhering to the "unities." According to this principle, a play should take place within a single day unity of time), in one location (unity of place), and follow a single central plotline (unity of action). This concept aimed to create a structured and tightly focused dramatic experience.

2.Use of Rhyme: Dryden advocated for the use of rhyme in drama, a characteristic feature of neoclassical plays. Rhymed verse was seen as a means to elevate the language and make the dialogue more poetic and formal.

3.Separation of Tragedy and Comedy: Dryden argued against the mixing of tragic and comic elements within the same play. He believed that tragic and comic elements should remain distinct and not interfere with each other, a departure from the more flexible approach of Shakespearean drama.

•Contrasting Perspectives:

The disparities between Aristotle's definition of tragedy and Dryden's definition of a play are evident. Aristotle's focus lies on the emotional and moral impact of the narrative, aiming to elicit profound feelings of pity and fear in the audience. In contrast, Dryden's emphasis is on structural and stylistic principles, including unity, rhyme, and the separation of genres.

While Aristotle's theories have influenced countless tragic works throughout history, Dryden's neoclassical ideals shaped a particular era of theater. Both definitions, though distinct, contribute to the rich tapestry of dramatic literature, highlighting the ever-evolving nature of the art form.

Aristotle's theories have led to timeless tragic masterpieces, such as Shakespeare's "Hamlet" and Sophocles' "Oedipus Rex." These works resonate with audiences by exploring the depths of human suffering and the consequences of hubris.

On the other hand, Dryden's neoclassical principles can be seen in the works of playwrights like Racine and Corneille, who adhered closely to unity of time, place, and action in their French classical tragedies.

•Conclusion:

Aristotle's definition of tragedy and Dryden's definition of play represent two distinct epochs in the evolution of dramatic theory. Whether one adheres to Aristotle's tragic principles or Dryden's structured rules, the world of theater continues to captivate and provoke audiences worldwide. These definitions remind us that the essence of theater remains open to interpretation and adaptation, allowing each generation of playwrights and theorists to shape the art form in their own unique way. In doing so, they ensure that the power and allure of the stage endure through the ages.

 Q-2.(e) Any topic of you choice but pertaining to Dryden as 'Father of English Criticism'.

  John Dryden: The Father of English Criticism

•Introduction:

In the vast tapestry of English literary history, there are certain figures whose contributions stand as pillars of influence. Among these luminaries, John Dryden shines brightly as the "Father of English Criticism." His enduring legacy in the realm of literary critique has left an indelible mark on the way we analyze, appreciate, and understand literature. In this blog, we will explore the life, works, and profound impact of John Dryden on the field of English criticism.

•The Life and Times of John Dryden:

John Dryden was born on August 9, 1631, during a period of great political and cultural upheaval in England. Raised in Northamptonshire, Dryden received a classical education that would become the foundation for his future literary endeavors. He attended Westminster School and later Trinity College, Cambridge, where he was immersed in the classics and exposed to the rich tradition of English literature.Dryden's Literary Achievements

Poetry: Dryden's poetic genius blossomed with works like "Annus Mirabilis" (1667), an epic poem that celebrated the events of the year 1666, and "Absalom and Achitophel" (1681), a satirical poem that tackled the political intrigues of his era. His mastery of the heroic couplet, a rhyming verse form, showcased his poetic prowess.

Drama: Dryden made significant contributions to the dramatic landscape of his time. His plays, including "The Indian Emperor" (1665) and "All for Love" (1677), demonstrated his versatility as a playwright and his ability to adapt classical themes to the English stage.

Translation: Dryden's translations of classical works, such as Virgil's "Aeneid" and Ovid's "Metamorphoses," are considered some of the finest in English literature. His translations bridged the gap between the ancient world and the modern English-speaking audience, making these timeless works accessible to a broader readership.

The Birth of English Criticism:

John Dryden's most enduring legacy lies in his contributions to the field of literary criticism. His essay "Of Dramatic Poesy" (1668) is often hailed as the birth of modern English literary criticism. In this seminal work, Dryden engages in a spirited dialogue with his contemporaries about the merits of ancient versus modern drama.

In "Of Dramatic Poesy," Dryden introduces the concept of the "ancients" (referring to Greek and Roman playwrights) versus the "moderns" (contemporary English playwrights). He defends the value of English drama and argues for its superiority by asserting that the moderns had learned and improved upon the principles of the ancients. Dryden's work heralded a shift away from strict adherence to classical ideals and set the stage for a more open and adaptive approach to literature.

•Dryden's Legacy:

John Dryden's legacy as the "Father of English Criticism" endures through his profound influence on subsequent generations of writers and critics. His ideas about the evolution of literary forms and the importance of adaptability continue to resonate in the study and interpretation of literature.

Dryden's advocacy for creative freedom and his willingness to challenge established norms paved the way for literary experimentation and innovation in English literature. His contributions to the world of criticism not only enriched the understanding of literary works but also encouraged a more inclusive and dynamic literary tradition.

•Conclusion:

In the annals of English literary history, John Dryden stands as a towering figure whose multifaceted talents and groundbreaking literary criticism have earned him the rightful title of the "Father of English Criticism." His poems, plays, and critical essays continue to captivate readers and scholars alike, reminding us of the enduring power of words and the ever-evolving nature of literature. John Dryden's legacy is a testament to the enduring importance of critical thought in the world of letters.


Thank you for visiting.😊 

Happy Learning...🍀


•Work cited:-

-https://www.britannica.com/art/tragedy-literature/Theory-of-tragedy

-https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Dryden

-https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/literature-and-arts/english-literature-1500-1799-biographies/john-dryden


1 comment:

"The home and world "

  Hello viewer! I am Kavita Chauhan,a student inM.A. sem 3 in  Department of English MKBU. Thinking activity