"Frankenstein ".

 Hello viewers! 👋

I am Kavita Chauhan and a student(M.A. sem-1) in Department of English,mkbu .

This Blog is a part of Thinking Activity of marry Shelley's Novel "Frankenstein"...🤔💬✍️

-Assigned by Megha Trivedi Ma'am.

"Frankenstein "

Basic information about the novel:-

Published:-1818(Epistemology novel)

Gernes:- Gothic novel

Setting:-Different part of Europe

Point of views:-  First person narrative.

Subtitle:- The Modern Prometheus.

Novelist:-

Born:-30 August 179 London, England

Died:-11 February 1851 London, England 

Spouse:- P.B. Shelley.

Marry Shelley was amazing author of the romantic age. She was an English novelist whose work has reached all corners of the globe she is best known as the author of Frankenstein.

Q-1.What are some major differences between the movie and the novel Frankenstein?

Answer:-    

In the novel "Frankenstein," the monster killed  Henry, and Victor leading to Victor's arrest for his friend's murder. However, this crucial plot point is not depicted in the movie adaptation.

Victor's youngest brother is murdered by the monster, and the blame falls on Justine, the maid, in both the novel and the movie. Yet, the way their punishments are portrayed differs between the two.

The novel 'Frankenstein' does not feature the blind man's grandchildren, while the movie adds these characters to the storyline.

In the novel, Victor willingly goes to the mountains on his adventure, but in the movie, the monster writes a letter to lure him there, altering the circumstances.

One of the most significant differences between the movie and the original novel "Frankenstein" is the final scene. In the novel, the monster converses with Victor about creating a female monster and begins the work but ultimately destroys everything in the ocean. In the movie, Victor creates a female monster named Elizabeth, creating a distinct departure from the source material    

 

Q- 2.  ) Who do you think is a real monster?

Answer:-

 The question of who the real monster is in "Frankenstein" can be explored through various lenses, as you've outlined. Each of these elements contributes to the complexity of the narrative and its exploration of monstrosity. Here's a concise summary of these potential sources of monstrosity:

Civilized' Society vs Hideous Appearance: Society's judgment based on outward appearances, favoring beauty over the hideous look of the creature, highlights the shallowness and cruelty of human judgment.

Victor Frankenstein: Victor's ignorance of the consequences of his creation, his narcissism in pursuing his scientific ambitions, and his abandonment of the creature all contribute to his potential as the real monster in the story.

Circumstances and Social Decorum: The societal expectations regarding human appearance and behavior can be considered monstrous, asthey lead to the creature's isolation and suffering due to his appearance.

Desire for Love, Infancy, and Innocence: The creature's inherent desire for love, connection, and his initial innocence as a newborn creation contrast starkly with the tragedies and violence that follow. His yearning for these basic human needs emphasizes the theme of innocence lost.

Rejection: The continual rejection the creature faces, both from Victor and society at large, drives much of the narrative's conflict and can be seen as a source of the monstrous actions he eventually takes.

Ultimately, "Frankenstein" presents a nuanced exploration of monstrosity, suggesting that it's not limited to the physical appearance of the creature but is deeply intertwined with societal norms, the actions of individuals like Victor, the impact of rejection, and the profound desire for acceptance and love. The novel encourages readers to consider these various elements when contemplating who or what the real monster might be in the story.

Q- 3. Do you think the search for knowledge is dangerous and destructive?

Answer:- 

In Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein," the pursuit of knowledge is depicted as both powerful and potentially dangerous. Victor Frankenstein's unbridled quest for scientific knowledge and the desire to unlock the secrets of life leads to devastating consequences. While knowledge itself is not inherently dangerous, it becomes destructive when it is pursued without ethical considerations and moral responsibility

Victor's relentless pursuit of knowledge without regard for the potential consequences illustrates the dangers of unchecked ambition and scientific curiosity. His creation of the monster and subsequent abandonment of it demonstrate the destructive consequences of his knowledge-seeking.

Shelley's portrayal of Victor serves as a cautionary tale about the responsibilities that come with knowledge and the potential harm that can result when scientific advancements are divorced from ethical considerations. In this sense, the novel suggests that the search for knowledge can indeed be dangerous and destructive if not accompanied by a sense of responsibility and ethical awareness.

Q- 4. Do you think Victor Frankenstein's creature was inherently evil, or did society's rejection and mistreatment turn him into a monster?

Answer:-              

 Novel "Frankenstein," the creature is not inherently evil. Instead, his character is shaped by the way society treats him and by his experiences of rejection and mistreatment. The creature is initially portrayed as a blank slate, born innocent and curious about the world. However, it's the continuous rejection and cruelty he faces from society, including his own creator, Victor Frankenstein, that drive him to commit violent and vengeful acts.

The creature's transformation into what some might describe as a "monster" is a result of his profound loneliness, isolation, and the absence of love and acceptance. He longs for human connection and strives to be understood and loved, but he is met with fear and violence wherever he goes. This societal rejection and mistreatment ultimately lead him to lash out and seek revenge.

In this sense, the novel suggests that it's not the creature's inherent nature that makes him a "monster" but rather the way he is treated and the circumstances in which he finds himself. Shelley's narrative raises questions about the nature of evil and the role that society plays in shaping individuals. It challenges readers to consider the consequences of rejection and mistreatment and how they can lead to tragic outcomes.

Q-5. Should there be limits on scientific exploration? If so, what should those limits be?

Answer:- 

In the context of Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein," the story itself serves as a cautionary tale about the potential dangers of unrestricted scientific exploration. Victor Frankenstein's unbridled pursuit of knowledge and his creation of the monster without ethical considerations lead to disastrous consequences. The novel underscores the need for certain limits on scientific exploration:

Ethical and Moral Limits: Scientific exploration should be conducted within a framework of ethical and moral principles. Researchers should consider the potential consequences of their experiments on individuals and society, as Victor Frankenstein failed to do.

Responsible Use of Knowledge: Scientists should be responsible for the knowledge they acquire and the applications of their discoveries. There should be a commitment to using scientific knowledge for the betterment of humanity rather than for selfish or destructive purposes.

Safety and Environmental Limits: Safety protocols and environmental considerations should be in place to prevent harm to human health and the environment. Victor's reckless disregard for safety had dire consequences.

Accountability: Scientists should be held accountable for the consequences of their research and experiments. In the novel, Victor's lack of accountability for his creation led to suffering and tragedy.

Regulation and Oversight: There should be oversight and regulation in fields where scientific exploration has the potential for significant harm or misuse. This could include guidelines for genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, or other areas with profound societal implications.

Public Awareness and Engagement: Public awareness and engagement in discussions about the ethical boundaries of scientific exploration are essential. Informed public discourse can help shape policies and limits.

In sum up, the cautionary tale of "Frankenstein" underscores the importance of responsible and ethical scientific exploration. While scientific progress is vital for human advancement, there should be limits in place to ensure that it does not lead to unintended harm or misuse. These limits should encompass ethical considerations, safety, accountability, and public engagement to strike a balance between scientific innovation and responsible stewardship of knowledge.

Thank you for visiting... 😊

Happy Learning 💫🍀.