Important of being Ernest

Hello viewers 👋!

I am Kavita Chauhan , a student in sem 1 M.A. Department of English, mkbu.

This Blog is a part of Thinking Activity about the Oscar Wilde 's Importance of being Ernest .

-Assigned by Megha Trivedi Ma'am

Q- 1. Wilde originally subtitled The Importance of Being Earnest “A Serious Comedy for Trivial People” but changed that to “A Trivial Comedy for Serious People.” What is the difference between the two subtitles?

Ans- The change in Oscar Wilde's subtitle for "The Importance of Being Earnest" from "A Serious Comedy for Trivial People" to "A Trivial Comedy for Serious People" is a simple yet profound shift.

The original subtitle, "A Serious Comedy for Trivial People," suggests that the play is substantial and thought-provoking, despite being targeted at people who might not be seen as very serious or deep in their thinking. It hints that the comedy holds hidden depth and social commentary.

In contrast, the revised subtitle, "A Trivial Comedy for Serious People," flips the emphasis. It portrays the play as light-hearted and amusing, tailored for a more sophisticated and earnest audience. Yet, it implies that beneath the humor, there are layers of satire and social critique that serious-minded individuals can appreciate.

In essence, the change highlights a play that can be enjoyed by all, with humor on the surface, and also as a work with deeper, more profound themes that are accessible to those who approach it with a more serious mindset. It underscores the duality of the play's appeal, catering to both the light-hearted and the intellectually inclined.

 

Q- 2. Which of the female character is the most attractive to you among Lady Augusta Bracknell, Gwendolen Fairfax, Cecily Cardew and Miss Prism? Give your reasons for she being the most attractive among all.

Ans- I find Cecily Cardew to be the most attractive female character in The Importance of Being Earnest. She is a sweet, simple, and innocent girl who is full of life and energy. She is also very intelligent and has a quick wit. Cecily is not afraid to speak her mind, even when it goes against the social norms of her time. I admire her courage and her independence.

In addition, I find Cecily to be a very funny character. She has a natural sense of humor and a way of seeing the world in a unique and refreshing light. She is not afraid to laugh at herself or others, which makes her even more endearing.

Finally, I find Cecily to be a very caring and compassionate person. She is always willing to help others in need, even if it means sacrificing her own comfort. She is the kind of person who would give the shirt off her back to help a friend.

In last, I find Cecily Cardew to be the most attractive female character in The Importance of Being Earnest because of her sweetness, simplicity, innocence, intelligence, courage independence, sense of humor, and compassion. 

Q- 3. The play repeatedly mocks Victorian traditions and social customs, marriage and the pursuit of love in particular. Through which situations and characters is this happening in the play.

Ans-  The play The Importance of Being Earnest repeatedly mocks Victorian traditions and social customs, marriage and the pursuit of love in particular, through a variety of situations and characters.

The double lives of Jack and Algernon: Both Jack and Algernon lead double lives, each with an alter ego named Ernest. This allows them to escape the restrictive social conventions of Victorian society and pursue their own pleasures. It also mocks the Victorian ideal of respectability, as both men are able to maintain their social standing despite their double lives.

The marriage market: The play satirizes the Victorian marriage market, in which young women were expected to marry wealthy men in order to improve their social standing. Gwendolen and Cecily, the two female protagonists, are both obsessed with finding husbands, and they are willing to overlook many flaws in their potential suitors. This mocks the Victorian ideal of marriage, which was seen as a transaction rather than a union based on love and companionship.

The importance of social class: The play also makes fun of the Victorian obsession with social class. Lady Bracknell, the mother of Gwendolen, refuses to allow her daughter to marry Jack because he is not of a high enough social class. This mocks the hypocrisy of Victorian society, which claimed to value merit over class, but in reality was very rigid and elitist.

Characters:

Lady Bracknell: Lady Bracknell is a caricature of the Victorian upper class. She is snobbish, materialistic, and judgmental. She is also very hypocritical, as she claims to value respectability and morality, but she is perfectly willing to overlook Jack's illegitimate birth as long as he is wealthy. Her character mocks the Victorian obsession with social status and respectability.

Gwendolen Fairfax: Gwendolen is a beautiful and intelligent young woman, but she is also very shallow and materialistic. She is obsessed with finding a husband who is wealthy and of a high social class. Her character mocks the Victorian ideal of womanhood, which emphasized beauty, obedience, and domesticity.

Cecily Cardew: Cecily is similar to Gwendolen in many ways, but she is also more innocent and naive. She is also more independent and outspoken. However, she shares Gwendolen 's obsession with finding a husband. Her character mocks the Victorian ideal of childhood, which emphasized innocence, purity, and obedience.

Through these situations and characters, Wilde satirizes the absurdity and hypocrisy of Victorian society. He uses humor, exaggeration, and irony to expose the flaws in the Victorian way of life.

In addition to the above, the play also mocks Victorian traditions and social customs in the following ways:

The play's title itself is a joke, as it suggests that being "earnest" is important, when in fact the play shows that earnestness is often ridiculed and punished.

The play's many witty lines and epigrams often satirize Victorian values and beliefs. For example, Lady Bracknell's famous line, "A handbag?" is a mocking commentary on the Victorian obsession with social status and material possessions.

The play's plot is full of improbable coincidences and implausible events. This is a deliberate device on Wilde's part, as he is using it to show the absurdity of Victorian society.

Overall, The Importance of Being Earnest is a play that is full of satire and wit. Wilde uses the play to poke fun at the many flaws of Victorian society, including its traditions and social customs, its marriage market, and its obsession with social class.

Q- 4. Queer scholars have argued that the play's themes of duplicity and ambivalence are inextricably bound up with Wilde's homosexuality, and that the play exhibits a "flickering presence-absence of… homosexual desire" Do you agree with this observation? Give your arguments to justify your stance.

Ans- Yes, I agree with the observation that the play's themes of duplicity and ambivalence are inextricably bound up with Wilde's homosexuality, and that the play exhibits a "flickering presence-absence of… homosexual desire."

Here are some arguments to justify my stance:

The play's focus on identity and masks. The play is all about the way that people create and perform their identities. Jack and Algernon are both masters of disguise, and they use their masks to escape the social constraints of their time. This can be seen as a metaphor for the way that gay people were forced to hide their true selves in Victorian society.

The play's homoerotic subtext. There are many moments in the play that can be read as homoerotic. For example, Jack and Algernon are constantly flirting with each other, and they often seem more interested in each other than they are in the women they are pursuing. Additionally, the name "Earnest" can be seen as a pun on the word "uranist," which was a contemporary term for a homosexual man.

The play's subversive humor. Wilde's humor is often subversive and challenges the social conventions of his time. For example, the play makes fun of the importance of marriage and social status. This can be seen as a way for Wilde to criticize the society that oppressed him and other gay people.

It is also important to note that the play has been interpreted in this way by many queer scholars and critics. For example, Susan Sontag wrote in her essay "Notes on Camp" that the play is "a gay play" and that Wilde "was the first major artist to treat homosexuality as a subject for laughter."

In conclusion, I believe that there is strong evidence to support the claim that the play's themes of duplicity and ambivalence are inextricably bound up with Wilde's homosexuality, and that the play exhibits a "flickering presence-absence of… homosexual desire."

Q-5.Below are given various movie and radio adaptations of this play. Write your critique on various adaptations of this play

Ans-   Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest is one of the most popular and enduring plays in the English language, and it has been adapted for film and radio many times over the years. Here is a critique of some of the most notable adaptations

The Importance of Being Earnest (1932): This early adaptation, directed by Anthony Asquith, is a faithful and charming rendition of the play. It features a star-studded cast, including Wilfrid Lawson, Joan Greenwood, and Athene Seyler.

The Importance of Being Earnest (1952): This adaptation, also directed by Asquith, is even more lavish and visually stunning than the 1932 version. It features a star-studded cast, including Michael Redgrave, Edith Evans, and Joan Greenwood.

The Importance of Being Earnest (1992): This adaptation, directed by Kurt Baker, features an all-black cast, including Brock Peters, CCH Pounder, and Malcolm-Jamal Warner. It is a fresh and innovative take on the play, and it highlights the play's universal themes of love, identity, and class.

The Importance of Being Earnest (2002): This adaptation, directed by Oliver Parker, is a stylish and witty rendition of the play. It features a star-studded cast, including Colin Firth, Ruper Everett, Judi Dench, and Reese Witherspoon.

All four of these adaptations are excellent in their own way, but I personally prefer the 1952 version. It is the most visually stunning and the most faithful to the play's original spirit. The cast is also superb, with Edith Evans giving a particularly memorable performance as Lady Bracknell.

Here is critique of each adaptation:

The Importance of Being Earnest (1932): This early adaptation is a charming and delightful rendition

of the play. It features a strong cast, including Wilfrid Lawson as Jack Worthing/Ernest, Joan Greenwood as Gwendolen Fairfax, and Athene Seyler as Miss Prism. The film is beautifully shot and directed, and it captures the play's wit and humor perfectly.

The Importance of Being Earnest (1952): This adaptation is even more lavish and visually stunning than the 1932 version. It features a star-studded cast, including Michael Redgrave as Jack Worthing/Ernest, Edith Evans as Lady Bracknell, and Joan Greenwood as Cecily Cardew. The film is beautifully shot and directed, and it perfectly captures the play's wit, humor, and social satire.

The Importance of Being Earnest (1992): This adaptation features an all-black cast, which gives the play a fresh and innovative perspective. The cast is excellent, with Brock Peters giving a particularly memorable performance as Jack Worthing/Ernest. The film is also well-directed, and it captures the play's wit and humor effectively. However, I found that some of the changes made to the play's plot and dialogue were unnecessary and distracting.

The Importance of Being Earnest (2002): This adaptation is a stylish and witty rendition of the play. It features a star-studded cast, including Colin Firth as Jack Worthing/Ernest, Rupert Everett as Algernon Moncrieff, Judi Dench as Lady Bracknell, and Reese Witherspoon as Cecily Cardew. The film is beautifully shot and directed, and it captures the play's wit and humor perfectly. However, I found that the film's tone was a bit too light and fluffy, and it didn't fully capture the play's social satire.

• Conclusion :

I think all four of these adaptations of The Importance of Being Earnest are excellent in their own way. However, if I had to choose a favorite, it would be the 1952 version. It is the most faithful to the play's original spirit, and it features a superb cast.

Thank you for visiting 😊

The Rover

Hello viewers 👋

I am Kavita Chauhan and a student in sem 1 M.A. department of English, mkbu.

This Blog is a part of Thinking Activity about Restoration era's Novel Rover.

-Assigned by Megha Trivedi Ma'am

Q- 1) Angellica considers the financial negotiations that one makes before marrying a prospective bride the same as prostitution. Do you agree?

Ans :Angelica's viewpoint, which suggests that financial negotiations before marrying a prospective bride are similar to prostitution, is a provocative one that aims to challenge conventional perceptions of these two very distinct practices. Let's explore the core elements of her argument:

Financial Considerations Angelica's argument is grounded in the notion that both marriage negotiations and prostitution involve financial considerations. In the case of marriage, financial discussions can revolve around prenuptial agreements, shared expenses, inheritance, and other monetary aspects. In prostitution, money is exchanged directly for sexual services. Both situations involve a financial dimension.

Commodification of Human Relationships Angelica's perspective touches upon the idea that in both scenarios, there is a degree of commodification of certain aspects of human relationships. In marriage negotiations, financial elements may indirectly influence decisions and obligations, potentially introducing an economic component to the relationship. In prostitution, the commodification is direct, with a clear exchange of money for a specific service.

Intent and Purpose Marriage is fundamentally based on love, commitment, and shared life goals. Financial negotiations in marriage are secondary to these foundational aspects and often serve to ensure fairness and security. In contrast, prostitution is a transactional relationship where sexual services are provided in exchange for payment.

Consent In marriage, financial negotiations typically occur within a consensual framework aimed at protecting the interests of both parties. In prostitution, issues related to consent and potential exploitation are central concerns.

Legal Framework Marriage negotiations are conducted within a legal framework that upholds principles of equity and fairness. Prostitution's legality and regulation vary widely, leading to complex legal and ethical questions.

In sum, while Angelica's comparison emphasizes the ethical considerations related to financial negotiations, it is essential to acknowledge that the nature and purpose of marriage and prostitution are fundamentally different. Marriage is a complex relationship founded on love and commitment, with financial discussions playing a supporting role. Prostitution, on the other hand, is a transactional exchange of money for specific services. The question of whether these practices are similar or distinct remains a matter of personal perspective and societal values, but their core differences should no to be overlooked.

Q- 2) "All women together ought to let flowers fall upon the tomb of Aphra Behn, for it was she who earned them the right to speak their minds." Virginia Woolf said so in 'A Room of One's Own'. Do you agree with this statement? Justify your answer with reference to your reading of the play 'The Rover

Ans:- Virginia Woolf's statement, "All women together ought to let flowers fall upon the tomb of Aphra Behn, for it was she who earned them the right to speak their minds," is a powerful acknowledgment of Aphra Behn's pioneering role in women's literature. While this statement relates more to Aphra Behn's overall contributions to women's literary history, we can still draw a connection to her work, including "The Rover."

Aphra Behn's "The Rover" challenges societal norms and provides a platform for women to assert their desires and opinions. Characters like Hellena and Florinda defy the conventions of their time, pursuing their romantic interests and speaking their minds. This is a reflection of the broader impact Aphra Behn had in allowing women to express themselves through literature.

In "The Rover," Behn's female characters are multidimensional, showcasing their wit, desires, and independence. Woolf's statement underscores how Behn's work paved the way for women to be more than just passive objects in literature, but active participants in expressing their thoughts and feelings.

So, in light of the themes and characters in "The Rover," I would agree with Woolf's statement that Aphra Behn deserves recognition for helping women find their voices in lite

rature.

 Q-.3) Which female character best represents the playwright, Aphra Behn? Consider the characteristics and beliefs of each female character, and make an argument that relates these distinctive attributes to what you know about Behn

Ans:

In "The Rover" by Aphra Behn, Hellena is a character who closely aligns with the playwright's own characteristics and beliefs. Hellena is witty, outspoken, and determined, qualities that Behn herself exhibited in her writing and life. Hellena 's boldness and independence in pursuing her desires mirror Behn's feminist ideals and her determination to challenge societal norms. She exemplifies a strong-willed and unconventional woman, which is in harmony with Aphra Behn's own persona and the challenges she faced as a female playwright in the 17th century. Thus, Hellena can be considered a character that best represents Aphra Behn in "The Rover."

One character that best represents her may be Angelica Bianca from her play "The Rover." Angelica is a strong, independent, and witty character who navigates the male-dominated society of the time. Behn's own independence and wit are reflected in Angelica's character, and her exploration of gender roles and power dynamics aligns with Behn's beliefs. This makes Angelica a compelling representation of Aphra Behn's characteristics and beliefs.

 Florinda can be seen as a character who best represents the playwright. Florinda possesses qualities that mirror Behn's beliefs and characteristics. Florinda is a strong-willed and independent character, reflecting Behn's own defiance of societal norms for women. She is not afraid to pursue her desires and make her own choices, which aligns with Behn's feminist views and her own unconventional career as a female playwright in the 17th century. Florida's complexity and determination make her a suitable representation of Aphra Behn in "The Rover."

Thank you for visiting 😊

Happy Learning 💫🍀

 

Jude the Obscure

Hello viewers 👋 

I am Kavita Chauhan, And a student in M.A. sem-1 department of English,mkbu.

This Blog is a part of Thinking Activity about Victorican Novel Jude the Obscure.

-Assigned by Dillip Bard Sir.

Q-1. What is the significance of epigraph written by Hardy -

  'Letter Killeth' - for this novel, Jude the Obscure

Ans:- Epigraphs in literature serve as a doorway to the themes and ideas that an author wishes to explore in their work. In Thomas Hardy's novel "Jude the Obscure," the epigraph "Letter Killeth" plays a pivotal role in setting the tone and conveying one of the central themes of the novel.

A Biblical Reference:

The epigraph is derived from the New Testament, specifically from 2 Corinthians 3:6, in the King James Version of the Bible. The verse reads: "Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life."

The Conflict Between Tradition and Individuality:

Hardy's choice of this biblical reference highlights a fundamental conflict that runs throughout the novel: the tension between traditional societal and moral norms (represented by "the letter") and the individual's aspirations and desires (represented by "the spirit"). This conflict is exemplified through the life of the novel's protagonist, Jude Fawley.

The Rigidity of Society:

Jude, a working-class man with dreams of gaining a university education, is constantly thwarted by the strict conventions of Victorian society. His aspirations are at odds with the societal expectations of his time, where social class and moral standards held significant influence. "The letter" symbolizes these rigid, oppressive social norms that hinder his progress.

The Call for Compassion:

By employing the epigraph, Hardy makes a powerful statement about the consequences of rigid adherence to societal conventions. It suggests that a literal interpretation of societal rules can be stifling and even destructive. Instead, "the spirit," symbolizing a more compassionate and flexible interpretation of these rules, is what gives life and vitality.

Jude's Struggles:

Jude's struggles with his desire for education and his forbidden love for his cousin Sue Bridehead are emblematic of the conflict between "the letter" and "the spirit." His life is marked by a series of disappointments, largely due to the societal norms that prevent him from achieving his dreams and living life on his own terms.

The Unsettling Realities:

Hardy uses the epigraph to emphasize the unsettling realities of his time, challenging the oppressive societal norms and urging readers to consider the importance of individual freedom and a more compassionate interpretation of societal rules.

Conclusion:

In "Jude the Obscure," the epigraph "Letter Killeth" is a literary device that introduces and reinforces the novel's central theme: the conflict between rigid societal norms and individual desires. It underscores the idea that a strict adherence to "the letter" of the law or societal conventions can have detrimental effects, while a more compassionate interpretation of these rules is needed to promote life, vitality, and personal fulfillment. By choosing this epigraph, Hardy invites readers to reflect on the societal constraints that limit human potential and consider the importance of a more humane and understanding society.

Q- 2.  Is it possible to connect the meaning of the epigraph of 'Esdras' at the beginning of the first chapter of the novel and the myth of Bhasmasur?

Ans:- 

   The epigraph at the beginning of "Jude the Obscure" by Thomas Hardy, taken from the biblical book of Esdras (also known as Ezra), reads: "The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." This epigraph is a profound biblical statement, and its connection to the myth of Bhasmasur can be explored in terms of the themes of interpretation, transformation, and the consequences of rigid beliefs.

In the biblical context, this epigraph suggests that a strict, literal interpretation of religious texts can be spiritually stifling or even deadly. It highlights the importance of understanding the deeper spiritual and moral meanings behind the words. This theme of interpretation is closely linked to Jude's intellectual pursuits in the novel, where he seeks higher education and deeper understanding of classical texts.

The myth of Bhasmasur, from Hindu mythology, tells the story of a demon who gains a destructive power, but he ultimately falls victim to his own inability to interpret the use of that power correctly. This myth can be seen as cautionary, warning about the dire consequences of misinterpreting the knowledge one acquires.

When considering both the epigraph and the Bhasmasur myth, a common theme emerges: the pitfalls of rigid or misinterpreted beliefs and knowledge. In both cases, individuals pay a heavy price for their inability to grasp the deeper, metaphorical, or moral aspects of their respective stories.

In "Jude the Obscure," this theme is central to the characters' struggles and the societal norms they grapple with. Jude, like Bhasmasur, seeks knowledge and transformation, but misinterpretations and societal pressures ultimately lead to tragic consequences.

In sum up, while the epigraph from Esdras and the myth of Bhasmasur come from different cultural and religious backgrounds, they share a common theme of the consequences of misinterpretation, especially when it comes to the acquisition of knowledge and the pursuit of transformation. Both serve as cautionary tales about the importance of understanding the deeper and more profound meanings of life's challenges and pursuits.

Q- 3. Structure of "Jude the Obscure"

Ans- 

Introduction

"Jude the Obscure," authored by Thomas Hardy, is a powerful and complex work of literature that delves into the themes of societal constraints, education, and human relationships. In this blog post, we'll explore the novel's structure, divided into two main parts and several chapters.

 "At Marygreen"

 The novel begins by introducing us to the protagonist, Jude Fawley, and his early life in the village of Marygreen. It portrays his desire for education and his meeting with his cousin, Sue Bridehead.

 "At Christminster"

Jude's aspirations lead him to Christminster, a city symbolizing Oxford, where he aspires to study at the university. This part outlines his struggles and disenchantment as he tries to gain access to higher education.

 "At Melchester"

Jude returns to his hometown and becomes a stonemason. His marriage to Arabella Donn is depicted, marked by various difficulties and challenges.

 "At Shaston"

 The narrative moves to Shaston, and we witness Jude's life with Arabella, which ultimately becomes strained, leading to her departure.

 "At  Aldbrickham and Elsewhere"

Jude encounters his cousin, Sue Bridehead, again, and a complex and unconventional relationship unfolds, steeped in love, passion, and turmoil.

 "At Christminster Again"

Jude and Sue return to Christminster, their struggles continue, and they grapple with moral dilemmas and societal pressures while chasing their dreams.

 "At Christminster Yet Again"

 The novel's final part brings a tragic climax to the story as Jude and Sue's relationship faces significant societal opposition and personal turmoil.

Conclusion

"Jude the Obscure" is a compelling exploration of human desires, societal constraints, and the consequences of pursuing one's dreams against the backdrop of a rigid Victorian society. Its structure, divided into these two major parts and the chapters within, guides readers through the life journey of the protagonist, Jude.

Thank you for visiting 😊

Victorian era

Hello viewers 👋

Iam Kavita Chauhan a student in the department of English, mkbu.

This Blog is a part of Thinking Activity about the victorian era .

-assigned by Megha Trivedi Ma'am.

•Q. Pre- Raphaelite school of poetry .

Ans- 

• Introduction: 

The 19th century witnessed a remarkable resurgence of art and literature in Britain, fueled by a desire to escape the perceived artificiality and decadence of the Victorian era. This period gave birth to the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, a group of artists and poets who sought to rekindle the flame of sincerity, nature, and beauty in their works. In this blog, we'll delve into the Pre-Raphaelite school of poetry, exploring its origins, key figures, distinctive characteristics, and lasting impact on the world of literature.

•  Defination:

 The Pre-Raphaelites were a group of young artists and writers of the Victorian era who formed the foundation called the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. With its tenets and principles, the brotherhood was similar to the modern-day fraternities and sororities, but they liked to contemplate literature and art.

• Origins of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood:

The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was founded in 1848 by three young artists: Dante Gabriel Rossetti, William Holman Hunt, and John Everett Millais. Dissatisfied with the conventional art and literature of their time, they aimed to return to the artistic ideals of the Italian painter Raphael and the detailed, nature-centric works of the artists who came before him. Their literary counterparts soon joined the movement, setting the stage for a new era of poetry.

• The members of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood were: 

Meeting 

• Dante Gabriel Rossetti
• William Michael Rossetti
• William Holman Hunt
• John Everett Millais
• James Collinson
• Frederic George Stephens
• Thomas Woolner.

 Pre-Raphaelite literature:

Literature and art were interwoven in the Pre-Raphaelite tradition. Many Pre-Raphaelite paintings are full of literary allusions and references. As an illustrator, Dante Gabriel Rossetti did collaborative projects with poets like Lord Alfred Tennyson, and his sister Christina Rosetti on their poetry collections. His illustrations display Dante’s creative interpretation of a work, rather than merely visualizing the text.

The Pre-Raphaelite poets include Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Christina Rosetti, and William Morris. The poetry of Dante Gabriel Rosetti continues to be the subject of scholarly investigation. Like their art, Pre-Raphaelite poetry was also criticized for its unconventionality, spirit of decadence, and evocative language. True to its name, Pre-Raphaelite poetry bore similarities to medieval sonnets and ballads, combined with sensuousness and decadence espoused by the movement.

Goblin Market (1862) by Christina Rosetti is a remarkable narrative poem of the Pre-Raphaelite era. It has garnered renewed scholarly interest due to its bold themes and allusions. Modern analysis of this poem focuses on its proto feminist elements and references to repressed feminine sexuality during the Victorian Era.

• Other examples of Pre-Raphaelite poetry:

 My Sister's Sleep,” “The Blessed Damozel,” “Jenny,” “Dante at Verona,” “A Last Confession", “On Mary's Portrait,” “Ave,” “The Bride's Prelude,” by Dante Gabriel Rossetti, published between 1847 and 1848

"The Earthly Paradise" (1868-70) and "The Defence of Guenevere" (1858) by William Morris

Poems and Ballads (1866) by Algernon Charles Swinburne include sensational poems like "Hymn to Proserpine" and "The Triumph of Time".

• Key Figures of Pre-Raphaelite Poetry

Several talented poets emerged from the Pre-Raphaelite movement, each contributing their unique voice and perspective to this revival of art and literature. Here are some of the most notable figures:

1.Dante Gabriel Rossetti:

 As a founding member of the Brotherhood, Rossetti played a pivotal role in shaping Pre-Raphaelite poetry. His works often explored themes of love, beauty, and the mystical. Poems like "The Blessed Damozel" and "Goblin Market" exemplify his poetic prowess.

2.Christina Rossetti: 

The sister of Dante Gabriel, Christina Rossetti is celebrated for her enchanting and emotional poetry. Her verses often depicted the plight of women and explored religious and spiritual themes. "In the Bleak Midwinter" and "Remember" are among her renowned pieces.

3.Algernon Charles Swinburne: 

Swinburne's poetry was characterized by its sensuous and vivid imagery. He was unafraid to tackle taboo subjects and was known for his passionate and intense style. His best-known works include "Dolores" and "The Garden of Proserpine."

•  Characteristics of Pre-Raphaelite Poetry

Pre-Raphaelite poetry is characterized by several distinctive features:

    Vivid and Detailed Imagery: 

Pre-Raphaelite poets were masters of vivid and detailed descriptions, often drawing inspiration from nature and the medieval past. Their poetry was filled with lush, colorful imagery.

      A Return to Nature:

 The Pre-Raphaelites had a deep appreciation for nature, and it frequently served as a backdrop for their poems. This focus on the natural world reflected their desire for authenticity.

    Sincerity and Authenticity: 

One of the central tenets of Pre-Raphaelite poetry was the pursuit of sincerity. They sought to cast aside the artificiality and social constraints of their time in favor of genuine emotional expression.

    Emphasis on Symbolism: 

Pre-Raphaelite poetry often featured complex symbolism, allowing readers to explore deeper meanings beyond the surface of the words.

• Pre-Raphaelite style:

Pre-Raphaelite style is characterized by an emphasis on nature, reminiscent of naturalism. They gave importance to fidelity to the object of art, even at the risk of unpleasantness, which drew a lot of criticism. Pre-raphaelite turned to nature to escape the artificiality of forms in the rising industrial age and preferred medieval aesthetics and style

•Legacy of Pre-Raphaelite Poetry:

The Pre-Raphaelite movement had a profound and lasting impact on the world of literature. It paved the way for later literary movements like symbolism and aestheticism. Poets who followed, such as W.B. Yeats and the symbolists, were influenced by the Pre-Raphaelite s' dedication to vivid imagery and symbolism.

End of The pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood disbanded largely due to public criticism and controversy. However, their influence continued and inspired later movements in arts and literature, although Pre-Raphaelite literature does not enjoy the fame other genres and movements now enjoy in literary history

• Conclusion:

In conclusion, the Pre-Raphaelite school of poetry remains a testament to the power of artists and poets who sought to rediscover beauty and sincerity in a rapidly changing world. Their commitment to authenticity and their ability to evoke emotion through vivid imagery continue to inspire and captivate readers and poets alike to this day

Thank you for visiting ☺️

Happy Learning 💫🍀

Words count: 1014

•work cited:

https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/english-literature/literary-movements/pre-raphaelite/

A Tale of a Tub

 Hello viewers 👋

I am Kavita Chauhan,a student in department of English, mkbu.

This  Blog is a part of Thinking Activity about  Johnathan Swift satirical work ''A Tale of a Tub ''.

-assigned by Vaidehi Ma'am.

Q- 1. How far do you think Digression is necessary?

Ans:- 

 I Think Digression short and to the point is necessary, But  the sum of digression that is necessary depends on the purpose of your writing.If you are writing a formal essay, you will probably want to avoid digression as much as possible. 

However, if you are writing a novel, or a memoir, you may have more freedom to digress. The most important thing is to be mindful of how much you digress and to make sure that your digressions are serving a purpose. 

Digressions aren’t just a fun little game that writers play. There’s a whole lot they can bring to your writing, if you know how to write them. A digression can be beneficial to the story as a whole, or it might have a negative impact on how the reader follows the plot.

Writers use digressions in order to create thoughtful descriptions of characters. They can also give important background information, create suspense, and ensure that the reader has a connection to the characters in the story. Without the latter, they won’t care how the conflict plays out. In some forms of writing, a digression can be used to provide didactic information. 

Q- 2. Identify any one movie/web series/song/poem/novel which talks about the sensitive topic like religion. Write in brief about it and explain what kind questions are raised through that work.

Ans :- One Hindi movie that addresses the sensitive topic of religion is "PK," directed by Rajkumar Hirani and starring Aamir Khan. The film tells the story of an alien named PK who arrives on Earth and questions various religious beliefs and practices.

"PK" offers a satirical and thought-provoking take on religious pluralism and the impact of religious beliefs and practices on society, encouraging viewers to reflect on the complexities and idiosyncrasies of different faiths

Questions raised by "PK" include:

How do different religious beliefs and rituals shape the lives of individuals and communities, and what happens when these beliefs are challenged?

Can an outsider's perspective, like PK's, provide a unique lens through which to analyze the diversity of religious practices and the similarities that unite them?

What are the consequences of blind faith and superstitions, and how do they influence people's lives?

How does the movie address the issue of religious intolerance and the need for interfaith understanding and harmony?

To what extent is religion used as a tool for manipulation and profit, and what are the social implications of such exploitation?

Thank you for visiting ☺️

Happy Learning 💫🍀

Pride and prejudice

 Hello viewers 👋

I am Kavita Chauhan, a student in sem 1 M.A. Department of English mkbu.

This Blog is part of Thinking Activity of unit -1 pride and predgudice.

-assigned by Megha Trivedi Ma'am.

• Write a blog on these questions:

1) Compare the narrative strategy of the novel and movie.

Ans-

Pride and Prejudice" is a classic novel written by Jane Austen, and there have been several film adaptations of the book. The narrative strategies in the novel and its film adaptations can vary, but here are some general points of comparison:

Point of View: The novel is primarily written in the third person, with a limited omniscient narrator, providing insights into the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters, especially Elizabeth Bennet. In contrast, films often adopt a more visual and cinematic approach, relying on facial expressions, body language, and dialogue to convey characters' emotions and perspectives.

Character Development: The novel has more space for character development and introspection. Readers gain deeper insights into the characters' inner thoughts and motivations through Austen's prose. In movies, character development is often more condensed due to time constraints, which can lead to some simplification.

Dialogue vs. Visuals: The novel relies heavily on witty and satirical dialogue, which can be challenging to fully capture in a film. While movies may include iconic lines and dialogue from the book, they also use visuals, settings, and music to convey emotions and atmosphere.

Narrative Choices: Filmmakers may make creative choices in adapting the story. They might emphasize certain themes or characters, omit subplots, or add visual elements to enhance the storytelling.

Character Interpretations: Actors bring their interpretations to characters, influencing how they are perceived. This can lead to variations in how characters are portrayed compared to readers' imaginations.

Visual Aesthetics: Films can offer visually stunning depictions of the settings, costumes, and manners of the time period, enhancing the audience's immersion in the story.

In sum up  the narrative strategy in the novel "Pride and Prejudice" and its film adaptations can differ due to the medium's inherent limitations and creative choices made by filmmakers. While the novel allows for deeper exploration of characters' inner lives, films use visuals and performances to convey the essence of the story within a shorter timeframe. Both mediums have their unique strengths in bringing this beloved story to life

2) Write an illustration of the society of Jane Austen's time.

Ans-

    

In the society of Jane Austen's time, which was the late 18th and early 19th centuries in England, several distinct characteristics and norms defined the social landscape:

Class Hierarchy: Society was rigidly stratified into different classes. The aristocracy and landed gentry occupied the highest rungs, followed by the clergy, military officers, and professionals. Below them were the middle class, consisting of merchants, tradespeople, and small landowners, and at the lowest end were the working class and servants.

Marriage and Social Status: Marriage was a significant focus of society, especially for women. Women's social standing and economic security often depended on their ability to make a good match. Marrying into a higher social class was a common aspiration.

Economic Dependence: Women had limited economic independence, particularly those from the upper classes. Their financial well-being was tied to their male relatives or their husbands. Inheritance laws often favored male heirs, leaving women vulnerable.

Education: Education for women was often limited, focusing on accomplishments like music, drawing, and languages. Men had broader access to education and career opportunities.

Social Gatherings: Social life revolved around gatherings, including balls, dinners, and tea parties. These events were essential for networking, establishing social connections, and finding suitable marriage partners.

Fashion and Manners: Fashion was a significant aspect of society. Dressing appropriately and in the latest styles was important for maintaining one's social standing. Manners, such as polite conversation and adhering to social conventions, were highly regarded.

Literature and Entertainment: Novels and literature played a crucial role in the social lives of the upper classes. Reading aloud and discussing books were common pastimes. The theatre and music were also popular forms of entertainment.

Gender Roles: Gender roles were clearly defined, with men expected to be the breadwinners and women responsible for domestic duties and child-rearing. Women had limited legal rights and could not vote.

Religion: Religion played a significant role in daily life, with the Church of England being the dominant religious institution. Attendance at church services was expected, and one's moral character was often judged by their religious devotion.

In Sum up Jane Austen's society was marked by strict social hierarchies, marriage-focused norms, and a complex web of social rules and expectations. Her novels, including "Pride and Prejudice," often explore the intricacies of this society, particularly the challenges faced by women in navigating their limited options and striving for personal happiness and security within the confines of their social class .

3) What if Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth never got together? What if Lydia's elopement had a different outcome? Explore the consequences of these changes and write alternative endings to the novel.

  Ans-

         Here are two alternative endings to "Pride and Prejudice" exploring the consequences if Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth never got together and if Lydia's elopement had a different outcome:

Alternative Ending 1: Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Never Get Together

In this scenario, Elizabeth remains steadfast in her initial rejection of Mr. Darcy's proposal. Despite his deep love for her, Darcy respects her decision and returns to Pemberley, eventually marrying a woman from his own social circle.

Elizabeth continues to live with her family at Longbourn, and her sisters eventually marry as well. Jane marries Mr. Bingley, but without the connection to Darcy, their financial situation remains modest. The younger Bennet sisters make less advantageous matches, and the family continues to face financial struggles due to Mr. Bennet's failure to secure their future.

While the Bennet family avoids the disgrace of Lydia's elopement, they still live with the consequences of their limited financial means. Elizabeth remains unmarried, valuing her independence and principles over societal expectations.

Alternative Ending 2: Lydia's Elopement Has a Different Outcome

In this version, Lydia's elopement is thwarted not by Mr. Darcy but by Mr. Wickham's growing debts and the intervention of Mr. Bennet. Mr. Bennet confronts Wickham and forces him to abandon his plans of elopement, reminding him of the scandal's consequences.

Lydia, initially furious with her father, eventually realizes the gravity of her actions and the potential ruin she narrowly avoided. She returns home, humbled by the experience, and over time, she matures. Mr. Wickham leaves the neighborhood, leaving Lydia free to consider her future.

Lydia's return home prevents the scandal and disgrace that would have befallen the Bennet family otherwise. Although they must bear the financial burden of Lydia's recklessness, her second chance at life allows her to grow into a more responsible and thoughtful woman.

In this alternate ending, the Bennet family remains intact and avoids the public shame associated with Lydia's elopement. Lydia's near-miss with scandal becomes a turning point in her life, leading to personal growth and maturity.

These alternative endings showcase the different paths the characters could have taken in "Pride and Prejudice," highlighting the importance of choices, consequences, and personal growth in the lives of the Bennet sisters and their potential suitors

Thank you for visiting... 😊

Happy Learning 💫🍀

Hard Times" by Charles Dickens

 Hello viewers 👋!

I am Kavita Chauhan, a student in( sem- 1 M.A. ) department of English, mkbu.

This Blog is a part Thinking Activity about Charles Dickens work Hard time.

-Assigned by Dilip Bard sir.

Q-  Discuss the theme of 'Utilitarianism' with      illustrations from the novel / or / discuss any other theme of your choice.

Ans.- 

"Hard Times" by Charles Dickens explores the theme of Utilitarianism, a philosophy that emphasizes practicality and the greatest good for the greatest number. The novel provides several illustrations of this theme:

Characterization of Mr. Gradgrind: 

Mr. Thomas Gradgrind, one of the central characters, epitomizes Utilitarianism. He is an advocate of facts and figures, raising his children on a strict diet of utilitarian education that neglects imagination and emotions. He believes that this approach will create efficient and productive citizens.

Utilitarianism in Education: 

The novel critiques the utilitarian approach to education through Mr. Gradgrind' s school, where students are treated as "vessels to be filled" with facts. This education system stifles creativity and individuality, leading to unhappy and robotic children like Louisa and Tom Gradgrind.

Coketown as a Utilitarian Society: 

The setting of Coketown reflects a utilitarian industrial society. It is a grim, polluted place where the pursuit of profit and efficiency takes precedence over the well-being of its inhabitants. The factories and machinery symbolize the dehumanizing effects of utilitarianism on the working class.

Harmonious Gradualism vs. Utilitarianism: Characters like Sissy Jupe and Salary circus troupe represent an alternative to utilitarianism. They value the human spirit, imagination, and kindness. Sissy's influence on the Gradgrind family highlights the contrast between utilitarianism and a more compassionate, well-rounded approach to life.

Consequences of Utilitarianism:

 As the story unfolds, we see the negative consequences of an overly utilitarian society. Characters like Louisa and Tom suffer emotionally and morally due to their upbringing, and the harsh realities of Coketown take a toll on its residents.

In "Hard Times," Dickens critiques the dehumanizing effects of utilitarianism and advocates for a more balanced and compassionate approach to life. He suggests that a society that prioritizes only practicality and efficiency neglects essential human qualities, leading to suffering and moral decay.

• Any other themes :-

Utilitarianism:As discussed earlier, the novel examines the harmful effects of a society governed by utilitarian principles, where the pursuit of efficiency and practicality overshadows human emotions and individuality.

Social Injustice and Class Divide:

 Dickens vividly portrays the stark disparities between the wealthy elite and the impoverished working class, highlighting the exploitation, oppression, and lack of fairness in society.

Emotional Deprivation: 

The novel delves into the emotional deprivation experienced by characters like Louisa Gradgrind and Tom Gradgrind, who are raised in an environment that values facts over feelings, leading to personal suffering and moral conflicts.

Industrialization and Dehumanization:

 "Hard Times" explores the dehumanizing effects of industrialization, where workers are reduced to mere cogs in a machine, subjected to harsh working conditions, and denied their basic humanity.

Escape and Redemption: 

Characters like Sissy Jupe and Salary circus troupe represent the possibility of escape from the rigid and oppressive society of Coketown, offering hope for redemption and a return to more humane values.

Individualism vs. Conformity:

 The tension between individualism and conformity is evident in characters like Stephen Blackpool, who stands up for his principles despite social pressure, and those like Bitzer, who conform unquestioningly to societal norms.

Parent-Child Relationships: 

The novel explores the complex dynamics of parent-child relationships, particularly the damaging effects of Mr. Gradgrind' s strict parenting style on his children.

Education and Enlightenment: 

Dickens critiques the limitations of an education system that prioritizes rote learning and facts over critical thinking, creativity, and a well-rounded understanding of life.

Moral Choices: Many characters in the novel face moral dilemmas and must make choices that reflect their values or societal expectations, illustrating the ethical challenges posed by the society they inhabit.

•Sum up:-

These themes collectively serve as a powerful critique of the social, educational, and economic conditions of the 19th-century industrial society in England while emphasizing the importance of compassion, empathy, and individuality in a balanced and just society

Thank you for visiting... 😊

Happy Learning 💫🍀

Assignment -101 Literature of the Elizabethan age and Restoration

Assignment-101 poetics justice in Macbeth 

This Blog is part of an Assignment of sem -1 Paper no. 101 Literature of the Elizabethan and Restoration Assigned by Dr. Dilip Bard sir Department of English,mkbu. In this assignment I am dealing with the topic of poetics justice in Macbeth.

                

Information:

Name : Kavita N. Chauhan

Roll No. : 17

Enrollment No. : 5108230010

Semester : 1st

Paper No. : 101

Paper Code : 22392

Paper Name : Literature of the Elizabethan and Restoration Periods

Topic : Poetics justice in Macbeth

Submitted to: Smt.S.B.Gardi,Department of English,MKBU                        

E-mail : kavitanchauhan2002@gmail.com

Point ponder :-

•Introduction

•William Shakespeare 

•Poetic justice

•Poetic justice in Macbeth

•Example of poetics justice

•Conclusion 

•Introduction:-

The phrase “poetic justice” is widely used nowadays in critical literature, especially in connection with the drama or the novel. It means that in literature the fate of a character should be guided by the rules of a so-called moral universe. It means that a good character in the play should be rewarded, and a bad one should be punished, according as he deserves. Shipley has explained the idea of “poetic Justice” in the following manner, “The literary scholar uses it to refer to the doctrine that all conflicts between good and evil. whether in the drama, the epic, or the novel, must be concluded with the reward of the virtuous and the punishment of the evil in order that good persons may be encouraged to preserve in their good works and that evil-does may be frightened from a persistence in evil course.”

•William Shakespeare:-

 Shakespeare also spelled Shakespeare, byname Bard of Avon or Swan of Avon, (baptized April 26, 1564, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England—died April 23, 1616, Stratford-upon-Avon), English poet, dramatist, and actor often called the English national poet and considered by many to be the greatest dramatist of all time.

Shakespeare occupies a position unique in world literature. Other poets, such as Homer and Dante, and novelists, such as Leo Tolstoy and Charles Dickens, have transcended national barriers, but no writer’s living reputation can compare to that of Shakespeare, whose plays, written in the late 16th and early 17th centuries for a small repertory theater, are now performed and read more often and in more countries than ever before. The prophecy of his great contemporary, the poet and dramatist Ben Jonson, that Shakespeare “was not of an age, but for all time,” has been fulfilled.

It may be audacious even to attempt a definition of his greatness, but it is not so difficult to describe the gifts that enabled him to create imaginative visions of pathos and mirth that, whether read or witnessed in the theater, fill the mind and linger there. He is a writer of great intellectual rapidity, perceptiveness, and poetic power. Other writers have had these qualities, but with Shakespeare the keenness of mind was applied not to abstruse or remote subjects but to human beings and their complete range of emotions and conflicts. Other writers have applied their keenness of mind in this way, but Shakespeare is astonishingly clever with words and images, so that his mental energy, when applied to intelligible human situations, finds full and memorable expression, convincing and imaginatively stimulating. As if this were not enough, the art form into which his creative energies went was not remote and bookish but involved the vivid stage impersonation of human beings, commanding sympathy and inviting vicarious participation. Thus, Shakespeare’s merits can survive translation into other languages and into cultures remote from that of Elizabethan England.

•Notable Works: 

“A Midsummer Night’s Dream” “All’s Well That Ends Well” “Antony and Cleopatra” “As You Like It” “Coriolanus” “Cymbeline” First Folio “Hamlet” “Henry IV, Part 1” “Henry IV, Part 2” “Henry V” “Henry VI, Part 1” “Henry VI, Part 2” “Henry VI, Part 3” “Henry VIII” “Julius Caesar” “King John” “King Lear” “Love’s Labour’s Lost” “Macbeth” “Measure for Measure” “Much Ado About Nothing” “Othello” “Pericles” “Richard III” “The Comedy of Errors” “The Merchant of Venice” “The Merry Wives of Windsor” “The Taming of the Shrew” “The Tempest” “Timon of Athens”

Poetics justice

        

•Definition of poetics justice :-⚖️

"an occasion when something bad happens to a person who seems to deserve it, usually because of bad things that person has done"

Poetic Justice meaning:

Poetic justice is employed by writers to make sure that good is rewarded and bad is punished at the end of the play. It is important to bring out the moral lessons from the play, because most of the audience relates themselves with the good characters in the play, and they sympathize with their bad situation. It is expected that the good characters are compensated and the bad are punished accordingly, otherwise the play doesn’t deliver a good lesson, and it leaves the audience in trauma. In short Poetic Justice is a literary view that virtue wins and vice loses in the long run.

•Poetics justice in Macbeth:-

In Macbeth, however, Shakespeare seems to have observed the rules of poetic justice. It is the only one of his great tragedies in which the hero turns into a villain. In all his other great tragedies the hero is on the side of virtue, and yet he suffers because of some inherent weakness (often called the “tragic flaw”) in his character. This inherent weakness comes in conflict with hostile circumstances and leads to tragedy. But in Macbeth the hero himself turns into a villain and most callously violates the moral order. His wife, too, becomes his accomplice in crime, and the two follow the path of evil out of their own choice Therefore, when they are punished in the end, we feel that they have been justly punished for their sins. Our sense of justice is thus fully satisfied in Macbeth.

The fall of Macbeth

At the start of the play Macbeth is a noble and heroic figure. He commands the respect of everybody. But there is one great flaw in his character, and that is his inordinate ambition. It is this soaring ambition which works as a motive force behind all his actions and ultimately brings about his downfall.

As time passes, Macbeth’s ambition turns into a burning passion and then into an obsession. It first of all compelled him to commit the murder of King Duncan who is not only a noble patron and guest to him but also his kinsman. After murdering Duncan, Macbeth usurps the throne of Scotland. making the lawful successor to the throne flee the country. After this first crime and the consequent fulfillment of his great ambition, we expect Macbeth to follow the path of good. But his inner weakness does not let him rest, for, as Hecate says in the play, “security is mortals’ cheapest enemy.” In order to make his position more secure, Macbeth indulges in even more terrible and heinous crimes than the first one. As a result his position becomes more and more shaky. He loses self-confidence altogether and depends more and more on superstition. He behaves like a hardened criminal. He hires assassins and gets his friend Banquo murdered. This is followed by the most inhuman murder of Macduff’s wife and children. He is a tyrant now and his own people turn and face terror from him. He is turned into a “hell-hound” as Macduff calls him.

Soon, however, his sins begin to recoil in his own head. He feels frustration, isolation, and mental affliction as a consequence. He faces desertion of his friends and well-wishers. His crimes and tyrannies cause widespread dissatisfaction among the people and in the end the silent rebellion brewing against him takes the form of an open struggle in which he is destroyed.

 The fall of Lady Macbeth

Like her husband, Lady Macbeth, too. follows the path of evil and pays heavily for it. She becomes his accomplice in crime. She invites him to murder the King. When he hesitates to do so, she brings all her will-power to bear upon him and goads him to perform the heinous deed. Without her active support Macbeth would never have committed the murder. But very soon Lady Macbeth too realizes the futility of her position as a queen. She feels that the fulfillment of their ambition has not brought happiness to them, but it has become rather a source of great anxiety. They now live in a kind of “doubtful joy.” Her sins also recoil upon her and she constantly suffers from deep spiritual anguish. Nemesis overtakes her. On the night of Duncan’s murder she had confidently asserted, “A little water clears us of this deed.” But a time comes when she feels that “all the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand.” She rubs her hands together all the time in order to get rid of the blood-spots which, she feels, have stuck permanently on them. This is a symbolic action of the deepest significance. Lady Macbeth’s conscience will never let her alone now for her sinful violation of her womanly nature. In the end, we are informed, she dies at her own hands. Thus in her case, too. our sense of justice is fully satisfied.

•Other Example of poetics justice:-

Romeo and Juliet

In Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet, the enmity between Montague and Capulet family finally comes to an end.

Othello

In Shakespeare’s play Othello, many characters experience poetic justice

Desdemona deceived her father for Othello and was finally killed by Othello.

Iago is sent to prison for all his evil deeds.

Cassio, who was a gentleman, is appointed as governor.

•Conclusion:-

Thus we find that both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are guilty of most unnatural and inhuman crimes, for which both of them suffer greatly. Both are subjected to deep mental and spiritual tortures, and in the end both of them perish as a result of their crimes. But Shakespeare does not paint them as monsters: he pictures them very much as human beings, who are led astray because of their misconceived notions of glory and greatness. He enlists our sympathy for them by presenting before us their minds and hearts torn by internal conflict. We do not so much hate them as pity them. But in spite of all our sympathy we feel that they have justly suffered for all that they have done in the earlier part of the play. Poetic justice has been fully observed in their case.

Thank you visiting & reading my Assignment 😊

Words-1765

Images-3

•Work cited:-

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/poetic-justice

https://shakespearequotesandplays.com/2016/04/08/poetic-justice-meaning-definition-examples-literary-terms/

https://quizsansar.in/what-do-you-understand-by-the-term-poetic-justice-write-a-note-on-the-ap plication-of-poetic-justice-in-macbeth/

https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Shakespeare

" Pamela was in the contemporary time."

 Hello viewers 👋!

 I am Kavita Chauhan and a student inM.A. (sem -1) Department of English,mkbu .

This Blog is a part Thinking Activity about 18th century  novel "pamela"..💬🤔✍️

-assigned by Vaidehi Ma'am.

• If Pamela was in the contemporary time, will the story take any changes?

 Imagine taking a character from a classic story and placing them in the contemporary world. What would change? How would the story unfold differently? In this blog post, we'll explore the hypothetical scenario of Pamela, the protagonist of Samuel Richardson's 18th-century novel, "Pamela," being transported to the contemporary era.

"Pamela," published in 1740, is a novel set in a vastly different social and cultural landscape than today. The story revolves around Pamela, a young maidservant, and her trials and tribulations as she resists the advances of her employer, Mr. B. The novel reflects the societal norms and values of the 18th century, where class distinctions were rigid, and women's rights were limited.

Pamela

Pamela's character is molded by the constraints of her time. She is virtuous, modest, and focused on maintaining her reputation and honor. Her resistance to Mr. B's advances is a central theme of the story, emphasizing the importance of chastity and moral integrity.

If Pamela was in the contemporary time:

In the contemporary time Pamela's world would be drastically different. Women have gained significant social and rights. Gender equality, while still a work in progress, has evolved substantially. Class distinctions and the concept of servitude has largely disappeared in many parts of the world.

Pamela would be able to pursue any career she wanted and would not be expected to marry simply to survive and she marry to Mr. B after she knows he was already married to woman and also their one  daughter ,so May be she is not accepted this things and take divorce with him and she could live with a partner of her choice

Pamela in this time and sexual harassment and assault are now considered crimes. Pamela would have more protection from the law she were to be abused by her employer Mr. B  beacuse contemporary time everyone have same right and regular for save their vartue and holiness in life.

Pamela go to college 

May be pamela could go to college and get a degree in any field she wanted or she could start her own business or become a leader in her field. And Pamela become self independent woman and make example as successful woman in society for women

In the contemporary world, Pamela would have more opportunities for education and employment. She might not find herself in a position of servitude, which could change the dynamics of the story.

Conclusion

Transporting a character like Pamela from the 18th century to the contemporary era would result in a vastly different story. Pamela's agency, options, and societal support would be dramatically improved. While the core themes of morality and virtue might still persist, the nuances of her character and the challenges she faces would undergo a profound transformation. This hypothetical exercise highlights the ever-changing nature of storytelling and how time and context can significantly impact a character's journey 

Thank you for visiting 😊

Happy Learning 💫🍀

''Movie reviews ''

 Hello viewers 👋!

I am Kavita Chauhan, a student of M.A. sem -1 in Department of English,mkbu .

This Blog is a part Thinking activity...💬🤔✍️ Of the movie reviews of two novels.

-assigned by Megha Trivedi Ma'am.

•Write Blog for Movie reviews:-

1). Movie reviews of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, a 1994 science fiction horror film directed by Kenneth Branagh

Director Kenneth Branagh takes the helm in this 1994 adaptation of Mary Shelley's iconic novel, "Frankenstein." With a blend of classic horror elements and a deep exploration of the human psyche, this film offers a unique take on a timeless story.

The Story:

"Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" closely follows the source material, with Victor Frankenstein (played by Kenneth Branagh) as the ambitious scientist obsessed with conquering death. Driven by grief over the loss of his mother, Victor becomes consumed by the idea of creating life from death. He succeeds in reanimating a stitched-together corpse (played by Robert De Niro), only to be horrified by the consequences of his actions.

What sets this adaptation apart is the emphasis on the emotional and psychological turmoil of its characters. Branagh explores the moral dilemmas and inner conflicts faced by Victor and his creation in a way that adds depth to the narrative. The film delves into themes of ambition, responsibility, and the consequences of playing god, giving viewers much to ponder.

Performances:

Kenneth Branagh' s portrayal of Victor Frankenstein is a standout performance. His ability to convey Victor's descent into madness and obsession is both captivating and chilling. Robert De Niro's portrayal of the Creature is also noteworthy, as he brings humanity to the character beneath the grotesque exterior. The supporting cast, including Helena Bonham Carter and Tom Hulce, deliver solid performances that enhance the film's emotional resonance.

Themes and Impact:

This adaptation of "Frankenstein" is not just a horror film; it's a thought-provoking exploration of ethical and philosophical questions. It delves into the consequences of unchecked scientific ambition and the isolation that can result from being an outcast. The film encourages viewers to reflect on the moral implications of scientific discovery and creation.

Conclusion:

"Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" (1994) is a worthy addition to the long list of adaptations of this iconic story. Kenneth Branagh 's directorial vision, coupled with powerful performances and a deep exploration of its themes, sets it apart as a classic in its own right. If you're a fan of horror films that provoke intellectual and emotional engagement, this adaptation of "Frankenstein" is a must-see. It stands as a testament to the enduring relevance of Mary Shelley's timeless tale of scientific ambition and its consequences

2).Movie reviews Of Pride & Prejudice, a 2005 romantic drama film directed by Joe Wright.

Movie screening 🎬

"Pride & Prejudice" (2005) - A Timeless Romance Brought to Life

Director Joe Wright's 2005 adaptation of Ja sene Austen's beloved novel "Pride & Prejudice" is a beautifully crafted romantic drama that captivates viewers with its period charm, exceptional performances, and timeless themes of love and societal expectations.

The Plot:

"Pride & Prejudice" faithfully follows the classic Austen tale, focusing on the spirited Elizabeth Bennet (played by Keira Knightley) and the proud Mr. Darcy (played by Matthew Macfadyen). The film explores the complexities of their relationship as they navigate societal norms, misunderstandings, and their own pride and prejudice. Wright's adaptation manages to condense Austen's rich narrative while retaining its essence, making it accessible to both fans of the novel and newcomers alike.

Porerformances:

The film boasts a stellar cast, with Keira Knightley and Matthew Macfadyen as standout leads. Knightley brings Elizabeth's wit, intelligence, and independence to life, making her a compelling and relatable heroine. Macfadyen' s portrayal of Mr. Darcy is nuanced and brooding, and his chemistry with Knightley sizzles on screen. The supporting cast, including Donald Sutherland, Brenda Blethyn, and Judi Dench, delivers exceptional performances that enrich the story.

Visuals and Cinematography:

"Pride & Prejudice" immerses viewers in the picturesque English countryside, beautifully capturing the essence of the early 19th century. Director of Photography Roman Osin's work is visually stunning, with sweeping landscapes, lush interiors, and intimate close-ups that enhance the emotional depth of the characters. The film's costumes and set design are also meticulously crafted, adding to the authenticity of the period.

Themes and Impact:

At its core, "Pride & Prejudice" explores themes of class, marriage, and societal expectations, offering a critique of the rigid social structure of the time. It celebrates the importance of self-awareness, empathy, and genuine connection in matters of the heart. These themes remain relevant, making the film not just a period piece but a story with enduring resonance.

Conclusion:

Joe Wright's "Pride & Prejudice" (2005) is a cinematic gem that successfully translates Jane Austen's classic novel to the screen. It is a testament to the enduring power of love and the timeless appeal of Austen's storytelling. With its strong performances, stunning visuals, and exploration of universal themes, this adaptation has earned its place as a beloved classic in the world of romantic cinema. Whether you're a fan of Austen's work or simply enjoy a well-crafted romance, this film is a must-watch.

Thank you so visiting ...☺️

Happy Learning 💫🍀